Silencing as a site of contestation during childbirth in Turkey
Selen Gobelez Dumas  1  
1 : Centre Norbert Elias  (CNELIAS)  -  Site web
École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales : UMR8562, Université d'Avignon et des Pays du Vaucluse : UMR8562, Aix Marseille Université : UMR8562, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique : UMR8562
2 Rue de la Charité 13002 MARSEILLE -  France

“Birth Stories are everywhere and nowhere”, Della Pollock

Silence about, during and after childbirth in Turkey is an almost unexplored phenomenon in social sciences. My PhD research about childbirth experiences of women in Turkey reveals how women experienced mistreatment during their maternity process and how lack of consent induces dissatisfied memories of birth. The over-medicalisation of childbirth without informed consent has been termed from a human rights perspective as “obstetrical violence”.[1] Women whose voices and desires were silenced during childbirth refer to feelings of embodied oppression, diminishment of self as well as physical and emotional infantilization.

As “maternal bodies are socially, sexually, ethnically, class specific bodies that are mutable in terms of their cultural production” (Longhurst, 2007, p. 3), the reaction and the responses of women in the face of violence and silencing during birth are varied. Some women act in accordance and use a tactic of self-silencing due to fears of leaving a bad impression and not acting like a “good girl”. Internalized technologies of gender serve to make birth more difficult for women and often cause them not to ask for what they need while giving birth and/or not to put themselves at the center of the birth experience. (Martin, 2003, p.59)

Women, afraid to be scolded, end up staying silent and obeying the rules of the hospital game. Ignoring, oblivion and silence become some forms of coping with the violence and the mistreatment. Moreover, most of these women remain silent about the details of their birth stories in their everyday lives. In various fields of health care, detailed interviews have been conducted with a sample of forty women who gave birth in Turkey within the last twenty-five years. To provide a plurality of experiences, fieldwork has been conducted of mothers from various geographical settings, who gave birth at private institutions, public hospitals or at home, vaginally as well as via C-section. These women whose age at first birth varied between 14 and 40, belong to differing social classes, with educational levels varying from illiterate to PhD graduate. Based on the ethnographic interviews with mothers, doulas, midwives and gynecologists, as well as my own experience and participant observations as a doula, this presentation aims at elaborating silence as a site of contestation between various actors during childbirth as silence can be a field of power play.

[1] This term was first officially formulated in 2007 when it was introduced in Venezuela as a new legal term as “the appropriation of the body and reproductive processes of women by health personnel, which is expressed as dehumanized treatment, an abuse of medication, and to convert the natural processes into pathological ones, bringing with it loss of autonomy and the ability to decide freely about their bodies and sexuality, negatively impacting the quality of life of women.” “Organic Law on the Right of Women to Be Free from Violence”, enacted in Venezuela on March 16, 2007.

Bibliographic references

BARBET, Denis, HONORE, Jean-Paul (2013) « Ce que se taire veut dire. Expressions et usages politiques du silence », in Barbet, D. & Honoré, J.-P. (dir.), Le silence, Mots. Les langages du politique, n°103, p.7-21.
BUTLER, Judith (2002), La Vie psychique du pouvoir. L'assujettissement en théories, Paris, Editions Léo Scheer.
BUTLER, Judith (2014b), Qu'est-ce qu'une vie bonne ?, Payot, Paris.
BUTLER, J. GAMBETTI, Z.& SABSAY, L. (eds.), (2016) Vulnerability in Resistance, Durham: Duke University Press.
CAHILL, Heather A. (2001), “Male Appropriation and Medicalization of Childbirth: An Historical Analysis”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 3, February: 334-342.
CHODOROW, Nancy (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CONRAD, Peter (2007). The Medicalization of Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
DAS, R. (2017), “Speaking About Birth: Visible and Silenced Narratives in Online Discussions of Childbirth”, Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117735753
DAVIS-FLOYD, Robbie E. (1992), Birth as an American Rite of Passage, Berkeley: University of California Press
DAVIS-FLOYD, Robbie E. & Davis, Elisabeth (1992), Intuition as Authoritative Knowledge in Midwifery and Homebirth” Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 10, No. 2, June: 237-269.
DİNÇ, Fatma Gökçen (2011), “Ignorant, Dirty, Superstitious Crones?”: Degrading of Midwifery and Midwives in Modern Turkey, Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1994), The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, Çev,A. M. Sheridan Smith, Vintage Books, New York.
FOUCAULT, Michel (2003b), Society Must Be Defended: Lecture at the College de France, 1975-76, The Penguin Press, London.
FOUCAULT, Michel (2004), “The Crisis of Medicine or the Crisis of Antimedicine?” Foucault Studies No.1: 5-19.
FOX, B.- WORTS, D. (1999), "Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth: A Contribution to the Sociology of Birth", Gender & Society, 13: 326-46.
GINSBURG, F. D. & RAPP, R. (1995), Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, California, University of California Press.
HANSON, C. (2004), A Cultural History of Pregnancy: pregnancy, medicine and culture, 1750–2000. Berlin, UK: Springer.
JACQUES, Béatrice (2007), Sociologie de l'accouchement, PUF - Le Monde, Collection Partage du savoir.
JORDAN, Brigitte (1997),“Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction”. in Davis- Floyd RE, Sargent CF, ed. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross- Cultural Perspectives. University of California Press, Berkeley: 55–79.
KITZINGER, Sheila (2011), Rediscovering Birth, Pinter & Martin Ltd.,
LAZAR, Judith (2001), « L'incivilité cognitive: une autre facette de la violence », Revue du M.A.U.S.S., 18: 282-291.

LAZARUS, Ellen (1994), “What Do Women Want? Issues of Choice, Control, and Class in Pregnancy and Childbirth”, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8(1): 25-47.
LONGHURST, Robyn (2007), Maternities: Gender, Bodies and Space, Routledge.
LUPTON, D. & SCHMIED, V. (2013), “Splitting Bodies⁄Selves: Women's Concepts of Embodiment at the Moment of Birth”, Sociology of Health & Illness 35, 6: 828–841.
MARTIN, Karin A. (2003), "Giving Birth like a Girl", Gender and Society, 17, 1, February: 54-72.
MURPHY-LAWLESS, Jo (1988), “The silencing of women in childbirth or Let's hear it from Bartholomew and the boys,” Women's Studies International Forum, Volume 11, Issue 4, 293-298.
NEGRIE, Laetitia & CASCALES, Beatrice, (2016), L'accouchement est politique, Éditions l'Instant Present.
OAKLEY, Ann (1980), Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
POLLOCK, Della (1999), Telling Bodies Performing Birth, Columbia University Press.
SARGENT, C.- BASCOPE, G. (1996), “Ways of Knowing about Birth in Three Cultures”, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, Volume 10, 2, June: 213-236.
SLEMBEK, Edith (1990), "L'éloquence réduite au silence : comment les femmes sont évacuées de la communication", in Feminin-Masculin, Publications de l'Université de Lausanne.
WEST C. & ZIMMERMAN D. (1975), "Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation". In Thoine B. & Henley N. (eds.) Language and Sex: Différence and Dominance, Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
YOUNG, Irving. (1980), “Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Mobility and Spatiality”, Human Studies, 3(2), 137-156.
ZOLA, Irving K. (1972), “Medicine as an Institution of Social Control”, Sociological Review, 20: 487-504.

 

Biographic elements

Selen Göbelez Dumas graduated from the Department of Philosophy at Boğaziçi University, Istanbul. She received her master's degree from Atatürk Institute for Modern Turkish History at Boğaziçi University, where she worked as Research Assistant, with MA Thesis titled "The History of Social Services in Republican Turkey: Social Change, Professionalism and Politics". She is a PhD candidate at the EHESS-Marseille. Her dissertation, entitled “Childbirth Narratives of Women in the Face of Medicalization of Childbirth in Turkey” deals with childbirth policies and construction of subjectivities of women in terms of gender relations and gender performances during childbirth in Turkey in 2000's. She is also trained as a doula, providing physical assistance and emotional support for women before, during and after birth.

 Publications:

“Harry Harootunian's Overcome By Modernity”, Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish History Online Journal, (Book Review)
“Erdoğan banned caesarean sections, so why does Turkey have the highest rates in the OECD?”, The Conversation, September 2016.
“Multiple Strategies of Birthing Women in the Face of Medicalization of Childbirth and Obstetrical Violence in Turkey”, Neoliberal Modes of Governing the Women's Body: Health, Reproduction and Sexuality in Turkey, IB Tauris, London (publishing in-process)
“Genç Annelere Kulak Vermek: Genç Annelerin Doğum ve Annelik Deneyimleri”, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul (publishing in-process)



  • Poster
Personnes connectées : 10